Omphalos wrote:boardadmin wrote:ijzersmidt wrote:Can anybody point me to a acceptable positive review/analyses of either Sandworms or Hunters? I have problems finding any.
Start here for Hunters.
Which actually does not count at all, since this is a "SciFi Essential Book" (which as far as I can tell means that it sucks) meaning that the organization that reviewed it has some interest in seeing it do well, financial or otherwise.